When I am working with my peers I incorporate what Paul refers to as the “self-control” approach. I do not force my attendees to follow my lead or participate. My thought process is that they are in my PD session because they had a desire to learn about the topic; therefore, they are “self-motivated, self-aware and … intelligent enough to impose their own … solutions to digital distraction.” I see my job as to make the PD interesting enough for them to self-impose the “self-control” approach.
It has been over five years since I was in the classroom. When I was working with high schools students I definitely “controlled by authority.” I felt it my responsibility to establish classroom rules as they related to acceptable behavior with the technology. At that time I did not allow cellphone in my classroom. As a matter of fact, if they brought their cellphone into my classroom and I saw (or heard) it, I would confiscate it and the student had to pick it up from the discipline principal. My, my – “the times they are a changing.” If I were to go back into the classroom today I would probably be inclined to use Paul’s “control through technology” approach at the start of the course. I still feel that I would need to establish rules and utilize the tools that are available in today’s technological world to “nudge students in the direction of desired use” at that time. However, I would make it my goal that students would learn to “self-control” after gaining understanding of my classroom atmosphere. I do believe it is possible to reach the “self-control” level; however, I do not think this can be done from day one. It is a process and as I said early, it would be my goal that by the end of the course my students could utilize the “self-control” atmosphere effectively. After all, it is what we all do in our respective careers, isn't it?
No comments:
Post a Comment